Right to Use Paid Sick Leave Letter to Employer (Free Template + State Tiers)
There is no federal paid-sick-leave law — this is decided state by state. If you live in a state with a paid-sick-leave statute, you have a legal right to USE your accrued sick time and to not be punished for it. This letter cites your state's statute (or your employer's own policy) and puts the demand in writing. Honest caveat built in: unlike vacation, sick leave generally does NOT have to be paid out when you leave.
the letter
Copy, customize, send.
[Your Full Name]
[Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Phone] [Email]
[Date]
[Employer Legal Name — Human Resources]
[Employer Address]
cc: [Direct supervisor, payroll]
Sent via certified mail, return receipt requested
(Copy also emailed to HR contact)
Re: Demand to Use Accrued Paid Sick Leave / Notice of Protected Sick-Leave Rights
To Human Resources:
I am writing about my accrued paid sick leave. [Choose the situation that applies and strike the others:]
• I requested to use accrued paid sick leave on [date(s)] and the request was denied or discouraged.
• I used accrued paid sick leave on [date(s)] and have since been [disciplined / written up / docked points under an attendance policy / threatened with termination / demoted / had hours cut].
• I am giving advance notice that I intend to use accrued paid sick leave for [date(s) / the period of] [a foreseeable medical appointment / treatment / a family member's care], as the law and/or company policy permits.
Relevant facts:
• Date of hire: [Date]
• Average hours worked per week: [Number]
• Accrued, unused paid sick leave as of [date]: [Number] hours
• Source of that balance: [pay stub dated (date) / HRIS export / company policy accrual schedule]
• Reason for use (you are not required to disclose a diagnosis): [my own illness / injury / health condition; preventive care; care for a family member; or a reason protected under my state's statute]
Legal basis:
[Pick the tier that applies to your state — strike the others.]
[TIER A — My state has a paid-sick-leave statute (statutory right to USE + anti-retaliation)]
Under [Cal. Lab. Code §§ 246, 246.5 / Wash. Rev. Code § 49.46.210 / Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-13.3-403 & -404 / N.Y. Labor Law § 196-b / N.J.S.A. 34:11D-2 & -3 / Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-372 & -373 / Mass. Gen. Laws c. 149 § 148C], I have accrued paid sick leave that I am legally entitled to use for the reasons set out in the statute, including my own or a family member's illness, injury, health condition, or preventive care. The same statute makes it unlawful to deny me the right to use that leave, or to discharge, threaten, demote, discipline, or otherwise retaliate against me for using it [Cal. Lab. Code § 246.5(c) / Wash. Rev. Code § 49.46.210(4) / Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-13.3-407 / N.Y. Labor Law § 196-b(7) / N.J.S.A. 34:11D-4 / Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-364(B) / Mass. Gen. Laws c. 149 § 148C(h)–(i)]. My employer may not count protected sick-leave absences against me under any attendance or "points" policy.
[TIER B — No state statute, but my employer's written policy promises paid sick leave]
My state does not have a paid-sick-leave statute, but [Employer]'s written policy [quoted at Section X of the Handbook, attached] grants paid sick leave and sets the terms for using it. That written promise is an enforceable term of my employment, and the company must honor its own policy. Denying me leave the policy grants me, or punishing me for using it, is a breach of that policy and may give rise to a wage claim if the leave functions as promised paid time.
[OPTIONAL — Federal-contractor employees only]
If I am employed on a covered federal contract, Executive Order 13706 and 29 C.F.R. Part 13 independently require my employer to provide paid sick leave (accrued at 1 hour per 30 hours worked, up to 56 hours per year), enforceable through the U.S. Department of Labor.
Demand:
[Choose what fits your situation:]
1. Approve my use of [Number] hours of accrued paid sick leave for [date(s)], paid at my regular rate.
2. Reverse the [discipline / write-up / attendance points / other adverse action] taken against me for using protected sick leave, and confirm in writing that it has been removed from my record.
3. Confirm in writing my current accrued paid-sick-leave balance and that I will not be retaliated against for using it.
Please respond within [14] days of receipt of this letter.
[Optional — only if your EMPLOYER'S POLICY promises a payout of unused sick leave at separation:]
Note: I understand state law generally does not require unused sick leave to be paid out at separation. I am making this payout request solely because [Employer]'s written policy [Section X, attached] promises payout of accrued, unused sick leave. On that basis I request payment of [Number] hours × $[Rate] = $[Amount].
If this is not resolved, I intend to pursue:
• A complaint with the [state labor agency / wage-and-hour division] for denial of sick leave and/or retaliation;
• Any remedies the statute provides, including reinstatement, back pay, and statutory penalties [where the law provides them];
• The rebuttable presumption of retaliation that applies where adverse action follows my protected leave [California: within 30 days, Lab. Code § 246.5(c)(2); Arizona / New Jersey: within 90 days, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-364(B) / N.J.S.A. 34:11D-4].
I would prefer to resolve this directly and continue doing my job. Please confirm in writing.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
Enclosures: [pay stub or HRIS export showing accrued sick-leave balance; relevant pages of the employee handbook / sick-leave policy; any write-up or attendance-point notice; written denial of leave if any]This template is for informational use only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Square-bracketed placeholders must be replaced with your specific facts. State law and procedural details vary; if your situation is urgent, complicated, or high-stakes, email info@imfrustrated.org for a free conversation with a volunteer attorney before you send it.
how to use it
A few things before you send.
- 1Send by certified mail with return receipt requested AND email a copy to HR. The certified-mail receipt proves delivery — and in states with a rebuttable presumption of retaliation (CA within 30 days; AZ and NJ within 90 days), a dated written record of your protected leave is exactly what triggers that presumption if they punish you afterward.
- 2Pull your accrued sick-leave balance from your most recent pay stub or HRIS export and attach it. Most paid-sick-leave statutes (e.g., Cal. Lab. Code § 246, N.Y. Labor Law § 196-b) require employers to show your available sick-leave balance on or with your wage statement, so the number is one they generated themselves.
- 3Pick your tier correctly. TIER A = your state has a paid-sick-leave statute (CA, WA, CO, NY, NJ, AZ, MA, plus CT, OR, RI, VT, MD, MI, MN, NM, IL, DC and others) — you have a statutory right to USE the leave and statutory protection from retaliation. TIER B = no state statute (most states, including TX, FL, GA, most of the South and Mountain West) — your only lever is your employer's own written policy, enforced as a contract.
- 4Do not disclose your diagnosis. Every paid-sick-leave statute lets you take protected leave for a covered reason without handing over medical details; over-explaining only gives an employer material to second-guess. State the category ('my own health condition,' 'to care for a family member') and stop there.
- 5Biggest mistake to avoid: demanding a PAYOUT of unused sick leave as if it were vacation. It usually is not. Unlike accrued vacation (which is wages in CA, CO, IL, MA and others), accrued sick leave generally does NOT have to be paid out at separation — CA § 246(g), WA WAC 296-128-690, CO § 8-13.3-403(5), NY § 196-b(6), AZ § 23-372(F), MA § 148C(d)(7) all say so. Only demand a payout if your employer's own written policy promises one; otherwise lead with the right to USE the leave and the anti-retaliation claim, which is where your real leverage is.
what the law actually says
Why this letter works.
Start with the honest baseline: there is no general federal paid-sick-leave law. The U.S. Department of Labor states plainly that "there are no federal legal requirements for paid sick leave." The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., provides only UNPAID, job-protected leave — up to 12 workweeks for eligible employees of covered employers (29 U.S.C. § 2612), and § 2612(c) confirms that leave "may consist of unpaid leave." The single narrow federal exception is for employees working on covered federal contracts: Executive Order 13706 and its rule at 29 C.F.R. Part 13 require those contractors to provide paid sick leave (1 hour per 30 hours worked, up to 56 hours a year). For everyone else, paid sick leave is a creature of STATE and LOCAL law — and roughly 18 states plus the District of Columbia have such laws, meaning the majority of states have no mandate at all.
In a state with a paid-sick-leave statute (TIER A), two rights matter and they are distinct. First, the right to USE accrued leave for a covered reason. California's Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act is the cleanest model: employees accrue paid sick days "at the rate of not less than one hour per every 30 hours worked" (Cal. Lab. Code § 246(b)(1)), and § 246.5(a) lists the covered uses — diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition or preventive care for the employee or a family member, plus leave for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Second, and just as important, the right to be FREE FROM RETALIATION. Section 246.5(c)(1) provides that an employer "shall not deny an employee the right to use accrued sick days, discharge, threaten to discharge, demote, suspend, or in any manner discriminate against an employee for using accrued sick days," and § 246.5(c)(2) creates a rebuttable presumption of unlawful retaliation if the employer takes adverse action within 30 days. A practical consequence: an employer cannot lawfully count protected sick-leave absences against you under a no-fault attendance or "points" policy. Note: California raised its minimums effective January 1, 2024 (SB 616) — annual use up to 40 hours/5 days, accrual cap 80 hours/10 days.
Other TIER A states reach the same place with their own numbers and their own anti-retaliation hooks. Washington (RCW 49.46.210): accrue 1 hour per 40 hours worked, no annual cap on use, and § 49.46.210(4) bars discrimination or retaliation "for his or her exercise of any rights under this chapter including the use of paid sick leave." Colorado's Healthy Families and Workplaces Act (C.R.S. § 8-13.3-403): 1 hour per 30, up to 48 hours/year, with anti-retaliation at § 8-13.3-407 that also bars counting protected leave as a disciplinary absence. New York (Labor Law § 196-b): 1 hour per 30 with tiered annual caps by employer size — 56 paid hours for employers of 100+, 40 paid hours for 5–99 and for the largest small employers, 40 UNPAID hours for the smallest low-revenue employers — and anti-retaliation at § 196-b(7). New Jersey (N.J.S.A. 34:11D-2 to -4): 1 hour per 30, up to 40 hours/year, with a rebuttable presumption of retaliation for adverse action within 90 days (§ 34:11D-4). Arizona (A.R.S. § 23-372 to -373): 1 hour per 30, 40 hours/year for employers of 15+ and 24 hours for smaller ones, with a 90-day rebuttable presumption of retaliation enforced by the Industrial Commission (§ 23-364(B)). Massachusetts (M.G.L. c. 149 § 148C): 1 hour per 30, up to 40 hours/year (paid for employers of 11+, unpaid for smaller), with interference and retaliation barred at § 148C(h)–(i).
The payout question is where people most often misread their rights — so be precise. Accrued VACATION is treated as earned wages in several states and must be paid out at separation; accrued SICK LEAVE generally is NOT. Every TIER A statute above says so expressly: Cal. Lab. Code § 246(g)(1) ("An employer is not required to provide compensation... for accrued, unused paid sick days upon termination, resignation, retirement, or other separation"); Washington WAC 296-128-690; Colorado C.R.S. § 8-13.3-403(5)(a); New York Labor Law § 196-b(6); Arizona A.R.S. § 23-372(F); Massachusetts M.G.L. c. 149 § 148C(d)(7). What these statutes give you instead is reinstatement: if you are rehired within a set window (one year in CA and WA, six months in CO, nine months in AZ), your previously accrued, unused sick leave is restored. So a payout demand only works if your employer's OWN written policy promises one — which some do, especially where vacation and sick time are merged into a single "PTO" bucket (in that case the whole bucket is typically treated as vacation and must be paid out in vacation-is-wages states). TIER B states (no statute — TX, FL, GA, and most others) impose nothing; your only enforceable lever is the employer's written policy as a contract.
state variations
What changes by state.
Not a comprehensive list. Confirm your state’s current statute before sending.
- California (Tier A)
- Cal. Lab. Code §§ 246, 246.5. Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs; use up to 40 hrs/5 days, accrual cap 80 hrs/10 days (SB 616, eff. 2024). § 246.5(c) bars retaliation for using sick days, with a rebuttable presumption if adverse action falls within 30 days. § 246(g): no payout at separation; reinstated if rehired within 1 year.
- Washington (Tier A)
- RCW 49.46.210. Accrue 1 hr/40 hrs, no annual use cap; carryover capped at 40 hrs. § 49.46.210(4) bars discrimination/retaliation for using paid sick leave. WAC 296-128-690: no payout at separation; reinstated (≤40 hrs) if rehired within 12 months.
- Colorado (Tier A)
- C.R.S. § 8-13.3-403 & -404 (Healthy Families and Workplaces Act). Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs, up to 48 hrs/yr. § 8-13.3-407: no retaliation and no counting protected leave as a disciplinary absence. § 8-13.3-403(5): no payout at separation; 6-month rehire reinstatement.
- New York (Tier A)
- N.Y. Labor Law § 196-b. Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs; tiered annual caps — 56 paid hrs (100+ employees), 40 paid (5–99), 40 paid or unpaid for the smallest employers by revenue. § 196-b(7) anti-retaliation; § 196-b(6): no payout at separation.
- New Jersey (Tier A)
- N.J.S.A. 34:11D-2 to -4 (Earned Sick Leave Law). Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs, up to 40 hrs/benefit year. § 34:11D-4: no retaliation, rebuttable presumption if adverse action within 90 days. Payout at separation is optional (employer may offer; not required).
- Arizona (Tier A)
- A.R.S. § 23-372 & -373 (Fair Wages and Healthy Families Act). Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs; up to 40 hrs/yr (15+ employees) or 24 hrs/yr (fewer). § 23-364(B): no retaliation, 90-day rebuttable presumption (rebut by clear and convincing evidence), Industrial Commission enforcement. § 23-372(F): no payout; 9-month rehire reinstatement.
- Massachusetts (Tier A)
- M.G.L. c. 149 § 148C (Earned Sick Time Law). Accrue 1 hr/30 hrs, up to 40 hrs/yr (paid for 11+ employees, unpaid for smaller). § 148C(h)–(i): interference and retaliation barred, including using sick-time use as a negative factor in any employment action. § 148C(d)(7): no payout at separation.
- Other Tier A states (statute exists)
- Connecticut, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Illinois, plus D.C. and many cities/counties also mandate paid sick (or paid leave) with anti-retaliation provisions. Same playbook: cite your statute's accrual/use and anti-retaliation sections; do not assume payout at separation.
- All other states (Tier B — no statute)
- Texas, Florida, Georgia, and most others have no state paid-sick-leave law. There is no federal mandate either (FMLA is unpaid; 29 U.S.C. § 2612). Your only lever is your employer's written policy, enforceable as a contract — and EO 13706 / 29 C.F.R. Part 13 if you work on a covered federal contract.
if this doesn’t work
Your next move.
If the employer denies your leave or punishes you for using it, file a complaint with your state's labor agency or wage-and-hour division (free, and most paid-sick-leave statutes are enforced administratively — e.g., California's Labor Commissioner, Washington L&I, Colorado CDLE, NY DOL, NJ DOL, Arizona's Industrial Commission, Massachusetts Attorney General's Fair Labor Division). These agencies can order reinstatement, back pay, and statutory penalties, and several statutes carry attorney's-fee provisions that make a private suit economical, especially a retaliation claim. Retaliation is the strongest card: where you used protected leave and were disciplined or fired shortly after, the rebuttable presumption (CA within 30 days; AZ and NJ within 90 days) shifts the burden to the employer. Move promptly — administrative complaint windows are often short (frequently within 1–3 years, and some are far shorter for retaliation), so check your state agency's deadline before you wait. In a no-statute (Tier B) state, your path is a breach-of-policy or wage claim built on the employer's own handbook, which is weaker but real where the policy clearly grants the leave.
questions people ask
FAQ.
Is there a federal law that gives me paid sick leave?
No. The U.S. Department of Labor confirms there are no federal requirements for paid sick leave. The FMLA (29 U.S.C. § 2612) only gives eligible employees up to 12 weeks of UNPAID, job-protected leave. The lone federal exception is for employees working on covered federal contracts under Executive Order 13706 (29 C.F.R. Part 13). Otherwise paid sick leave depends entirely on your state or city.
My employer wrote me up under an attendance-points policy for using sick days. Is that allowed?
In a state with a paid-sick-leave statute, generally no. Statutes like Cal. Lab. Code § 246.5(c), Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-13.3-407, and Mass. Gen. Laws c. 149 § 148C(h) bar employers from using protected sick-leave absences as a negative factor in discipline — that includes no-fault "points" systems. If the write-up followed protected leave, the rebuttable-presumption rule (30 days in CA; 90 days in AZ and NJ) may shift the burden to your employer to justify it.
Do I have to tell my boss what's wrong with me to use sick leave?
No. Paid-sick-leave statutes let you take leave for a covered reason without disclosing a diagnosis. You can state the category — your own health condition, preventive care, or caring for a family member — and your employer generally cannot require medical documentation for short absences (many statutes only allow it after three or more consecutive days). Keep your explanation brief.
When I quit or get laid off, do they have to pay out my unused sick leave?
Usually not. Unlike vacation (which is earned wages in CA, CO, IL, MA and other states), accrued sick leave generally does NOT have to be paid out at separation — see Cal. Lab. Code § 246(g), N.Y. Labor Law § 196-b(6), Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-372(F), and the equivalents in WA, CO, and MA. The exception is if your employer's own written policy promises a payout, or if sick and vacation are combined into one "PTO" bucket that gets treated as vacation. Many statutes do require reinstatement of your balance if you're rehired within a set window.
My state isn't one of the ones listed. Am I out of luck?
You have no statutory right, but check two things. First, your employee handbook — if it grants paid sick leave, that's an enforceable contract term and the company has to honor it. Second, whether you work on a federal contract, which triggers EO 13706. About 18 states plus D.C. (and many cities) have paid-sick-leave laws; if you're not in one, the employer's own policy is your only real lever.
Nervous about sending it yourself?
we’ll read it over with you.
Email the situation and a volunteer attorney will respond. No commitment, no invoice, no judgment — just an honest second pair of eyes from someone who actually understands the law.
info@imfrustrated.org