Free Trial Turned Into Recurring Charges? Cancellation + Refund Demand (ROSCA + State Auto-Renewal Laws)
You signed up for a "free trial" — or a cheap intro month — and the charges kept coming, including after you tried to cancel. Federal law (ROSCA) and most state auto-renewal laws require clear disclosure, your real consent, and an easy cancellation. This letter invokes them, cancels in writing, and demands a refund of the charges that should never have hit your account.
the letter
Copy, customize, send.
[Your Full Name]
[Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Phone] [Email]
[Account / Subscription ID, if any]
[Date]
[Company Legal Name — Attn: Billing / Customer Retention]
[Company Address]
cc: [Card issuer / bank — see step 5]
Sent via certified mail, return receipt requested
(Copy also sent to [billing@ / support@] on [Date])
Re: Cancellation of subscription [Account/Order #] and demand for refund of $[Total] in negative-option charges
To whom it may concern:
I am writing to (1) cancel — effective immediately — the recurring subscription tied to the account above, and (2) demand a refund of charges made to my [card / bank account] for a "free trial" or auto-renewing subscription that was not properly disclosed, not properly consented to, and/or continued after I asked to cancel.
The facts:
• What I signed up for: [e.g., "7-day free trial of [Service]" / "$1 intro month"] on [Date], at [website / app / store].
• What I was told it would cost: [what the offer said — or "nothing was clearly stated about ongoing charges"].
• What actually happened: I was charged $[Amount] on [Date(s)] — a total of $[Total] across [N] charges.
• If applicable — I already tried to cancel: I [clicked cancel / called / emailed] on [Date] via [method]. [It would not let me cancel / I was put through a retention maze / I got no confirmation / they charged me again anyway].
Why these charges are improper:
This is a "negative option" arrangement — silence or inaction is treated as consent to keep being billed. Federal law and the law of most states regulate exactly this. One or more of the following applies to my situation:
• The trial-to-paid conversion and the recurring price, billing frequency, and cancellation deadline were not disclosed clearly and conspicuously before I gave billing information.
• I never gave express, informed consent to ongoing recurring charges (a pre-checked box, a buried term, or a "continue" button is not consent).
• The company failed to provide a simple cancellation mechanism — at least as easy as the sign-up — so I could stop the charges.
• The company kept charging me after I cancelled.
Legal basis:
[FEDERAL — applies in every state]
Under the federal Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA), 15 U.S.C. § 8403, it is unlawful to charge a consumer for goods or services sold online through a negative-option feature unless the seller (1) clearly and conspicuously discloses all material terms before obtaining the consumer's billing information, (2) obtains the consumer's express informed consent before charging, and (3) provides simple mechanisms to stop recurring charges. Under 15 U.S.C. § 8404, a violation is treated as an unfair or deceptive act or practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act (enforceable by the FTC, and by state attorneys general under 15 U.S.C. § 8405). Charges that fail any of these three requirements are unlawful.
[Pick the state tier that applies to you — strike the others.]
[TIER A — State auto-renewal statute (CA, NY, IL, VA, VT, FL, and many others)]
My state's automatic-renewal / continuous-service law imposes the same core duties as ROSCA and adds consumer-specific remedies. Under [Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17600 et seq. (esp. § 17602) / N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 527-a / 815 ILCS 601/10 (Illinois Automatic Contract Renewal Act) / Va. Code § 59.1-207.46 / 9 V.S.A. § 2454a / Fla. Stat. § 501.165], a business that offers an automatic renewal or continuous-service plan must present the renewal terms clearly and conspicuously, obtain my affirmative consent before charging, and let me cancel through a simple mechanism that is at least as easy as the way I signed up (and, where I enrolled online, allow me to cancel online). Because the company failed to meet these requirements [and/or kept charging me after I cancelled], the charges identified above are improper and refundable. [California: under Bus. & Prof. Code § 17603, products or services sent to a consumer under a non-compliant automatic-renewal offer are deemed an unconditional gift the consumer may keep without payment.] [Florida / Vermont: a non-compliant automatic-renewal provision is void and unenforceable.]
[TIER B — No specific state auto-renewal statute]
My state does not have a standalone automatic-renewal statute, so I rely on federal ROSCA (above) together with my state's Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP) / consumer-protection statute, which prohibits deceptive billing and unauthorized recurring charges. The conduct above is an unauthorized charge and a deceptive practice under both.
Note on the FTC "Click-to-Cancel" Rule: I am NOT relying on the FTC's 2024 negative-option amendments (the "Click-to-Cancel" Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 425) — that rule was vacated by the Eighth Circuit in Custom Communications, Inc. v. FTC, No. 24-3137 (8th Cir. July 8, 2025) and is not in force. The grounds above (ROSCA and state law) are independent of it and remain fully in effect.
Demand:
Within [14] days of receipt of this letter, please:
1. Confirm in writing that my subscription is cancelled and that NO further charges will be made;
2. Refund $[Total] for the [N] charge(s) identified above to my original payment method; and
3. Send written confirmation of the cancellation and refund to the address above.
If you do not:
• I will dispute every charge with my [card issuer / bank] as an unauthorized / improperly disclosed recurring charge, and provide them this letter and my cancellation records;
• I will file complaints with the Federal Trade Commission (reportfraud.ftc.gov), my state Attorney General's consumer-protection division, and the Better Business Bureau; and
• I reserve the right to pursue any remedy available under ROSCA, my state's automatic-renewal law, and my state's UDAP statute, including statutory damages, restitution, and attorney's fees where the statute allows.
I would prefer to resolve this directly and quickly. Please treat this letter as my written cancellation as of the date above.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
Enclosures: [screenshot of the original offer/checkout page; sign-up confirmation email; card/bank statements showing the charges; any cancellation request you sent and any confirmation or error you received]This template is for informational use only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Square-bracketed placeholders must be replaced with your specific facts. State law and procedural details vary; if your situation is urgent, complicated, or high-stakes, email info@imfrustrated.org for a free conversation with a volunteer attorney before you send it.
how to use it
A few things before you send.
- 1Send it by certified mail with return receipt requested to the company's billing or legal address, and also email a copy to their support/billing address the same day. The certified-mail receipt and the dated email together prove you cancelled in writing — which is what defeats a later "we never got your cancellation" excuse.
- 2Attach your proof. The single most persuasive enclosure is a screenshot of the original offer or checkout screen showing what you were (or weren't) told about ongoing charges, plus the bank/card statements showing each charge and the date(s). If you already tried to cancel, attach that request and any confirmation or error message.
- 3Pick your state tier. If you're in a state with an auto-renewal statute (California, New York, Illinois, Virginia, Vermont, Florida, and many more — see State notes), use Tier A and name your statute; it adds remedies ROSCA alone doesn't. If your state has no specific statute, use Tier B (federal ROSCA + your state's UDAP law). Either way the federal ROSCA paragraph applies everywhere.
- 4Highest-leverage move: send the letter AND start a card chargeback in parallel. A written cancellation plus a same-day bank dispute is what actually stops the bleeding — the company answers to its payment processor, and a documented ROSCA/auto-renewal violation makes the dispute very hard for them to win. Don't wait for the 14 days to run before disputing recent charges; chargeback windows are limited.
- 5Top mistake to avoid: cancelling only by clicking a button in the app and assuming it stuck. Retention flows "fail," pause instead of cancel, or quietly re-bill. Always get cancellation in writing with a date, and keep paying attention to your statement for one more billing cycle.
what the law actually says
Why this letter works.
A "negative option" is any arrangement where your silence or inaction is treated as consent to keep being charged — the classic example is a free trial that silently converts to a paid subscription, or a plan that auto-renews unless you affirmatively cancel. These are legal to offer, but only if the seller is straight with you about them. The governing federal statute is the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA), 15 U.S.C. § 8401-8405, enacted in 2010 and fully in effect. Its operative provision, 15 U.S.C. § 8403, makes it unlawful to charge a consumer for anything sold online through a negative-option feature unless the seller does three things: (1) "clearly and conspicuously" discloses all material terms of the transaction before obtaining the consumer's billing information; (2) obtains the consumer's "express informed consent" before charging; and (3) provides "simple mechanisms" for the consumer to stop recurring charges. Fail any one of the three and the charge is unlawful.
ROSCA has real teeth. Under 15 U.S.C. § 8404, a violation "shall be treated as a violation of a rule under section 18 of the Federal Trade Commission Act regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices," which means the Federal Trade Commission enforces it with the full FTC Act toolkit, and under 15 U.S.C. § 8405 state attorneys general can bring their own actions on behalf of residents. Individual consumers don't have a private right of action under ROSCA itself, but its standard is the backbone of FTC and state enforcement and is highly persuasive in a billing dispute, a chargeback, or a state UDAP claim. A separate note on freshness: the FTC adopted amended negative-option rules in 2024 (16 C.F.R. Part 425, the so-called "Click-to-Cancel" Rule), but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated that rule in its entirety in Custom Communications, Inc. v. FTC, No. 24-3137 (8th Cir. July 8, 2025), on procedural grounds. That rule is NOT currently enforceable, so this letter does not rely on it — it relies on ROSCA and state auto-renewal law, which are unaffected by the vacatur.
Most large states layer their own automatic-renewal law on top of ROSCA, and these often give the consumer stronger remedies. California's Automatic Renewal Law, Bus. & Prof. Code § 17600 et seq., is the strictest: § 17602 requires the renewal terms to be presented clearly and conspicuously, in visual proximity to the consent request, with the consumer's affirmative consent before any charge, and an easy cancellation mechanism — including, for online sign-ups, a "prominently located direct link or button" to cancel online (the 2024 AB 2863 amendments, effective for contracts entered, amended, or extended on or after July 1, 2025, tightened this further). Critically, § 17603 deems goods or services shipped under a non-compliant auto-renewal offer to be an "unconditional gift" the consumer may keep without paying. New York's Gen. Bus. Law § 527-a requires the same clear-and-conspicuous disclosure and affirmative consent, a cancellation mechanism "as easy to use as the mechanism" used to enroll, and — for terms of one year or more — a renewal reminder sent 15 to 45 days before the cancellation deadline. Illinois's Automatic Contract Renewal Act, 815 ILCS 601/10, requires clear-and-conspicuous disclosure, affirmative consent, online cancellation for online sign-ups, a notice 3 days before the end of any free trial of 15+ days, and a 30-60 day renewal notice for contracts of 12 months or more.
Beyond California, New York, and Illinois, a long and growing list of states has comparable statutes — Virginia (Va. Code § 59.1-207.46), Vermont (9 V.S.A. § 2454a, which uniquely requires a separate affirmative opt-in to the auto-renewal in bold-face type), and Florida (Fla. Stat. § 501.165, which makes a non-compliant auto-renewal provision void and unenforceable), among many others. The common spine across all of them mirrors ROSCA: disclose the recurring terms clearly before you pay, get genuine consent, and make cancellation easy. If you live in a state without a dedicated auto-renewal statute, you are not out of options: federal ROSCA still applies to any online sale, and every state has an Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP) consumer-protection statute that prohibits deceptive billing and unauthorized recurring charges. The practical reality is that the demand letter plus a card chargeback resolves the great majority of these disputes long before any statute has to be litigated — the company's exposure to its payment processor and to regulators is usually enough.
state variations
What changes by state.
Not a comprehensive list. Confirm your state’s current statute before sending.
- California
- Bus. & Prof. Code § 17600 et seq. (§ 17602): clear-and-conspicuous disclosure, affirmative consent before charging, easy/online cancellation (AB 2863 tightening effective for contracts on/after July 1, 2025). § 17603 deems goods sent under a non-compliant offer an "unconditional gift" — keep them, owe nothing. Strongest auto-renewal law in the country.
- New York
- Gen. Bus. Law § 527-a. Clear-and-conspicuous disclosure + affirmative consent; cancellation must be "as easy to use" as sign-up and through the same medium; for terms of one year or longer, a renewal reminder 15-45 days before the cancellation deadline.
- Illinois
- Automatic Contract Renewal Act, 815 ILCS 601/10. Disclosure + affirmative consent; online sign-ups must be cancellable online; notice 3 days before the end of a free trial of 15+ days; 30-60 day renewal notice for 12-month-plus contracts. Violation = unlawful practice under the Consumer Fraud Act.
- Virginia
- Va. Code § 59.1-207.46. Automatic-renewal/continuous-service terms must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously, in visual proximity to the consent request, with affirmative consent before any charge.
- Vermont
- 9 V.S.A. § 2454a. For contracts of one year or longer that renew for more than a month: terms must be stated clearly and conspicuously in bold-face type, the consumer must take a separate affirmative opt-in to the auto-renewal, and a 30-60 day renewal notice is required.
- Florida
- Fla. Stat. § 501.165. Auto-renewal provision must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously; cancellation allowed by the same means used to accept; for 12-month-plus contracts, a 30-60 day renewal notice. A non-compliant auto-renewal provision is void and unenforceable.
- All other states (federal + UDAP default)
- Federal ROSCA (15 U.S.C. § 8403) applies to any negative-option sale made online, and every state has an Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP) statute barring deceptive billing and unauthorized recurring charges. Use Tier B: cite ROSCA plus your state consumer-protection act. Many additional states (e.g., Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Oregon) also have dedicated auto-renewal statutes — check your state AG's site.
if this doesn’t work
Your next move.
If the company ignores you, the fastest real-world remedy is your bank: dispute the charges as unauthorized/improperly disclosed recurring charges and attach this letter plus your cancellation records — most card networks side with a consumer who has a documented written cancellation and a clear ROSCA/auto-renewal violation. In parallel, file a complaint with the FTC (reportfraud.ftc.gov) and your state Attorney General's consumer-protection division; both enforce ROSCA and state auto-renewal laws, and a pattern of complaints draws scrutiny. For the money itself, small-claims court is cheap and lawyer-free for amounts up to your state's limit (commonly $5,000-$10,000), and several state auto-renewal/UDAP statutes provide statutory damages and attorney's fees that make a private suit economical — California's UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200) and most state UDAP acts allow fee-shifting and sometimes treble or minimum statutory damages. Watch the clock: card chargeback windows are often only 60-120 days from the statement, and UDAP statutes of limitations run 2-4 years depending on the state.
questions people ask
FAQ.
They keep charging me even though I clicked "cancel" in the app. Is that legal?
No. Federal ROSCA (15 U.S.C. § 8403) requires a simple mechanism to stop recurring charges, and most state auto-renewal laws require cancellation to be at least as easy as sign-up and effective when you make it. Charges after a valid cancellation are unauthorized. Send this letter in writing, keep the dated proof, and dispute the post-cancellation charges with your bank.
I never noticed the free trial would convert. Doesn't that mean I agreed?
Not necessarily. The law puts the burden on the seller, not you. Under ROSCA and state auto-renewal statutes, the conversion price, billing frequency, and cancellation steps must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously before you hand over payment information, and you must give express, informed consent. A pre-checked box or a term buried in fine print does not count. If they didn't disclose it properly, the charge is improper.
Isn't there a federal "click-to-cancel" rule that makes this easy?
There was supposed to be — the FTC's 2024 amended Negative Option Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 425) — but the Eighth Circuit vacated it in Custom Communications, Inc. v. FTC (No. 24-3137, July 8, 2025), so it is not currently enforceable. Don't rely on it. You still have strong footing: federal ROSCA and your state's auto-renewal and UDAP laws, all of which remain fully in effect and are what this letter uses.
Should I send the letter or just dispute the charge with my bank?
Do both, in parallel. The letter is your written cancellation and your demand; the chargeback is what actually claws back the money. A documented written cancellation plus a same-day bank dispute is the combination that resolves most of these. Start the chargeback promptly — card-network dispute windows are usually only 60-120 days from the statement date.
How far back can I get refunded?
Practically, your card issuer's chargeback window (often 60-120 days per statement) limits how many past charges you can claw back directly. Legally, your state's UDAP statute of limitations (commonly 2-4 years) governs a lawsuit, and in some states a non-compliant auto-renewal provision is void from the start (e.g., Florida § 501.165), and goods sent under one are an "unconditional gift" (California § 17603). Demand a full refund of every improper charge; you'll often recover more than the chargeback window alone would allow.
Nervous about sending it yourself?
we’ll read it over with you.
Email the situation and a volunteer attorney will respond. No commitment, no invoice, no judgment — just an honest second pair of eyes from someone who actually understands the law.
info@imfrustrated.org